There is an enormous amount of excellent aerodrome content online, and a great deal of it is filmed in the United States. If you operate outside the FAA system, be careful what you take from it.
The FAA and ICAO systems agree on most things and diverge on a number of specifics — markings, signage conventions, some geometry, and a good deal of terminology. The divergences are not errors on either side. They are two coherent systems that made different choices, and each is correct within its own jurisdiction.
The risk is not that somebody paints an entire runway to the wrong standard. It is subtler: an engineer sees a detail in a video or a manufacturer's brochure, assumes it is the international standard, and specifies it. It gets built. It is then found at audit, and by that point it is in concrete.
Before you adopt any detail you have seen elsewhere, find it in the document that actually binds you — your national regulation or manual of standards, which transposes Annex 14 with your state's own differences filed against it. If it is not there, that is the answer.
And if you work across several states, as I do, assume nothing carries over. The annexes are the same. The transposition is not.
The full introduction to aerodrome compliance and certification — how the curriculum is structured, what certification is actually for, and how these decisions get made in practice. No card, no call.
Start Module 0